|
![]() |
IPY 2007-2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated
on
05/01/2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Full Proposals for IPY 2007-2008 Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Locations | Coordindates |
|---|---|
| Mackenzie (Canada) | |
| Lena and Pechora (Russia) | |
| Tana (Norway, Finland) | |
| Kuparuk River LTHO | 69 ºN 149 ºW |
| Sermilik (Greenland) | 65 ºN 38 ºW |
| Zackenberg (Greenland) | 74 ºN 20 ºW |
| Number of hydrological stations | Distributed in the Arctic |
2.4 Define the approximate timeframe(s) for proposed field activities?
| Arctic Fieldwork time frame(s) | Antarctic Fieldwork time frame(s) |
|---|---|
| 01/07 - 12/09 | |
| 04/07 - 09/09 |
2.5 What major logistic support/facilities will be required for
this project?
Multi-instrumented platforms
New field station
Helicopters
Snow terrain vehicles
Existing field stations
2.6 How will the required logistics be supplied? Have operators been approached?
| Source of logistic support | Likely potential sources | Support agreed |
|---|---|---|
| Consortium of national polar operators |
||
| Own national polar operator | ||
| Another national polar operator | ||
| National agency | Y | |
| Military support | ||
| Commercial operator | ||
| Own support | Y | |
| Other |
2.7 If working in the Arctic regions, has there been contact with local indigenous groups or relevant authorities regarding access?
3.1 Origin of the activity
This activity is the start of a new programme that will outlive IPY
3.2 How will the activity be organised and managed? Describe
the proposed management structure and means for coordinating across the
cluster
The proposed project management structure is based on the matrix organizational model. One dimension of the matrix will be cross-cutting activities, e.g., the Arctic-HYCOS observing system with extensions, modelling and data assimilation, data management and information dissemination and outreach. The other dimension of the matrix will be the individual LTHOs with process studies. Each component will be lead by a Principal Investigator, PI, but the overall project will be lead by a steering committee consisting of the PI´s, lead by the PI of the lead project as well as with representation from WMO HWR, CHy and WCRP/CliC, GRDC and ICARPII. The PI´s will establish, as they deem necessary, scientific group or other management structure for their activity. In the case of Arctic HYCOS, a steering group has already been established where all the NHMSs have representatives, as well as WMO and ICARPII.
The co-ordination will take place via steering group meetings on both levels, but common workshops and conferences will provide the forum for integration and exchange. The first meeting will be during ICARP II in Copenhagen in November and further meetings will also take advantage of the forums under IASC. Arctic HYDRA conference is envisaged during 2008.
3.3 Will the activity leave a legacy of infrastructure and if
so in what form?
The establishment of high quality hydrological observation system within the Arctic with associated data and information system will be one of the legacies of the IPY.
3.4 Will the activity involve nations other than traditional
polar nations? How will this be addressed?
There are nations that traditionally work in the Arctic, although their jurisdiction does not extend to the polar regions. It is assumed that they will freely continue to work in the Arctic through research coordination with local organizing groups, participation in workshops, conferences and proposals, and as outside reviewers. These research facilities are viewed as international research community assets.
3.5 Will this activity be linked with other IPY core activities?
If yes please specify
The project will link with other clusters within IPY, e.g., IPY-Thorpex and other Meteorological and climatological cluster, clusters on the terrestrial cryosphere, e.g. snow, permafrost, glaciers and ice caps, for integration and input and with other clusters, e.g. ocean circulation, biochemistry and ecosystems, Northern resources, change: adaptation and vulnerability; coupled human-environmental systems, and new risk and stresses. Through establishment of the montiroing network essential for ICARPII, it also has indirect links with other IPY programs that have also been identified by ICARPII as being essential to meeting the longer term joint objectives of both these programs. These additional IPY studies include: GLACIODYN (a program initiated by the International Arctic Science Council-Working Group on Arctic Glaciology), ICEMACH-GIS (ICE MAss CHange on the margins of the Greeland Ice Sheet); and Thermal State of Permafrost (TSM, an integrated set of permafrost-related projects overseen by the International Permafrost Association)
3.6 How will the activity manage its data? Is there a viable
plan and which data management organisations/structures will be involved?
The National Hydro and Hydrometeorological Services have a long tradition on managing data and information systems according to standards and WMO protocol (ref. Resolution 25 and 40). They will be responsible for the data collected within their part of the system. Furthermore, the Global Runoff Data Center, GRDC, will manage time series from the core network and various open data centres on the Arctic, e.g., NSIDC/ARCSS, IORGC/JAMSTEC, AMAG will conserve as well as disseminate the data.
3.7 Data Policy Agreement
Will this activity sign up to the IPY draft Data Policy (see website)
Yes
3.8 How will the activity contribute to developing the next generation
of polar scientists, logisticians, etc.?
Numerous graduate students and research technicians will be involved in this research effort and will gravitate towards the next generation of polar researchers. Some of the sites are already used as training and teaching facilities for university courses and for training of local administrations of environmental issues.
3.9 How will this activity address education, outreach and communication
issues outlined in the Framework document?
There are many targeted groups (scientist, K-12, indigenous people, general public, etc.) with varied depths of interest that must be accessed through various forms of communication and outreach. This will be accomplished through a variety of means: K-12 by presentations at schools, field trips, and websites; indigenous people by visits to local villages and websites; general public by television, newspapers and websites; and scientist through conferences, workshops, data sets, and usually professional publications.
The Arctic Hydra would provide for collection, computer processing, archival storage, exchange among the countries of the Arctic region and transmission to the appropriate international data centers and organizations of the following data and information:
1) data of current observations of the hydrological cycle characteristics to near real-time mode at the stations of the NHS according to the agreed regulations;
2) metadata and historical data as well as current observation data after the primary processing; these data processing, storage and maintenance would be provided by the facilities of the Arctic Runoff Data Base (ARDB) which is under operation since 1996 within the WMO Global Runoff Data Center (GRDC) in Koblenz, Germany.
3) space-time generalized observation data and information products prepared with the use of modern information technologies and mainly intended for solution of research problems ( coupled modeling, hydrological modeling, assessment of water resources and hydrological regime due to climate change, etc.); besides, they may be used to solve different applied problems (water resources management, hydrological forecasts, hydrological computations for water projects, etc.) as well as to implement international research programs and projects under the auspices of WMO, UNESCO, WCRP, CliC and others related to the Arctic region.
3.10 What are the proposed sources of funding for this activity?
National Hydro and Hydrometeorological Sevices, National research funding, Arctic Council, World Bank
3.11 Additional Comments
4.1 Contact Details
Lead Contact
Dr Árni Snorrason
Hydrological Service, National Energy Authority
Grensásvegur 9,
Reykjavík
IS-108
Iceland
Tel:
+354 569 6000
Mobile:
+354 893 4222
Fax:
+354 568 8896
Email:
asn@os.is
Second Contact
Prof Charles Vorosmarty
University of New Hampshire
Complex Systems Research Center, Morse Hall,
University of New Hampshire,
Durham NH
3824
USA
Tel:
603-862-0850
Mobile:
N/A
Fax:
603-862-0587
Email:
charles.vorosmarty@unh.edu
4.2 Other significant consortium members and their affiliation
| Name | Organisation | Country |
|---|---|---|
| Judith Curry | Georgia Institute of Technology | USA |
| Douglas Kane | University of Alaska Fairbanks | USA |
| Tetsuo Ohata | JAMSTEC | Japan |
| John Pomeroy | University of Saskatchewan | Canada |
| Bent Hasholt | University of Copenhagen | Denmark |
| Markku Puupponen | SYKE | Finland |
| Rune Engeset | NVE, National Hydrological Service | Norway |
| Jean-Guy Zakrevsky | Environment Canada, National Hydrological Service | Canada |
| Valery Vuglinsky | State Hydrological Institute | Russia |
| Terry Prowse | University of Victoria & Environment Canada | ICARPII |
| Wolfgang Grabs | WMO HWR | Swiss |
| Vladimir Ryabinin | WCRP/CliC | Swiss |
| Thomas Maurer | Global Runoff Data Center | Germany |
| Scott Lamoureux | Queen's University | Canada |
| Dr. Alain Pietroniro | National Hydrology Research Centre | Canada |
| Jukka Käyhkö | Department of Geography, University of Turku | Finland |
| Georgia Destouni | Department of Physical Geography & Quaternary Geology, Stockholm University | Sweden |