|
![]() |
IPY 2007-2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated
on
05/01/2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Full Proposals for IPY 2007-2008 Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Locations | Coordindates |
|---|---|
| Antarctica, WAIS Divide Ice Core site | S 79.468, W112.086 |
| East Antarctica, Dome C-North Vostok-Dome B | |
| Northwest Greenland | |
| Various locations on the Greenland ice sheet | |
| Various locations on the Antarctic ice sheet |
2.4 Define the approximate timeframe(s) for proposed field activities?
| Arctic Fieldwork time frame(s) | Antarctic Fieldwork time frame(s) |
|---|---|
| 05/07 - 09/07 | 11/07 - 03/08 |
| 05/08 - 09/08 | 11/08 - 03/09 |
2.5 What major logistic support/facilities will be required for
this project?
Fixed wing transport aircraft
Ice drilling capability
New field station
Snow terrain vehicles
Fuel depots
Existing field stations
Fixed wing transport aircraft
Fixed wing geophysical aircraft
Further details – Drilling camps potentially can offer support for other activities on the ice sheets. No large advances in technology are envisioned, apart from advances in ice drilling and analytical tools. Funds have already been committed for some projects: WAIS Divide drilling (U.S.), Talus Dome (Europe).
2.6 How will the required logistics be supplied? Have operators been approached?
| Source of logistic support | Likely potential sources | Support agreed |
|---|---|---|
| Consortium of national polar operators |
Y | |
| Own national polar operator | Y | |
| Another national polar operator | Y | |
| National agency | Y | |
| Military support | Y | |
| Commercial operator | Y | |
| Own support | Y | |
| Other |
2.7 If working in the Arctic regions, has there been contact with local indigenous groups or relevant authorities regarding access?
3.1 Origin of the activity
This activity is the start of a new programme that will outlive IPY
3.2 How will the activity be organised and managed? Describe
the proposed management structure and means for coordinating across the
cluster
IPICS developed from an international meeting (Washington, April 2004). The meeting included scientists from Great Britain, Denmark, France, Russia, United States, Germany, Japan, China, Switzerland, Italy, and Australia. IPICS builds on existing successful multinational projects such as GRIP, EPICA, Vostok, NGRIP, and ITASE. IPICS has a small steering committee, and has established two international writing groups. A report from the first workshop is now available (http://nicl-smo.unh.edu/IPICS).
Organization will be discussed fully at the second IPICS meeting, arranged by ESF for Oct. 16-19, 2005, in Brussels. Representatives of NSF, EPB, and other national logistic operators were present at IPICS I and are involved in the planning of IPICS II meeting The existing steering committee (set up initially to organise the first meeting) will be expanded. Its role will be to define the target drill sites, collate the outcomes, and maintain overall IPICS structure and momentum. Individual activities will be organized and run by separate national and international consortia – a method that has worked well in successive previous projects.
We expect that steering committee activities will be supported by individual nation’s funding agencies. Coordination across the cluster will be facilitated by including members involved in each EOI activity on the IPICS steering committee. The initial IPICS meeting and IPY EOI included individuals from the main cluster components.
3.3 Will the activity leave a legacy of infrastructure and if
so in what form?
Yes. 1. Location for the oldest possible Antarctic ice core. 2. Drilling camp and possibly core through the full interglacial in Greenland. 3. Drilling camp and shallow sections of WAIS Divide ice core. 4.The backbone of a major network of cores.5.New ice drilling technology including replicate coring, lightweight drills, and next generation drilling fluid. 6.The next generation of ice core scientists and drilling engineers.
3.4 Will the activity involve nations other than traditional
polar nations? How will this be addressed?
IPICS involves all nations with interests in ice coring. All nations with polar presence or interest can conceivably contribute to the late Holocene network, and possible to other aspects of IPICS.
3.5 Will this activity be linked with other IPY core activities?
If yes please specify
Yes. We will have direct links with EOI 62 (BIPOMAC: A study of the interplay of northern and southern polar processes in driving and amplifying global climate variability), EOI 561 (Greenland’s ice sheet – reactions to past and present climate change), EOI 301 (TASTE-IDEA Traverses), and EOI 607 (State and Fate of the Cryosphere). Links with these and other projects (as the latter develop) will be facilitated by IPICS members who are also involved in the other IPY initiatives.
3.6 How will the activity manage its data? Is there a viable
plan and which data management organisations/structures will be involved?
Major ice coring projects have traditionally deposited their datasets at WDC for Paleoclimate in Boulder, USA, Pangaea, and/or NSIDC in Boulder. This will continue for the IPICS elements. The IPICS steering committee will take an active role in creating effective data management structures. Data management and the structure of a data sharing and archiving agreement will be one of the agenda items for the Oct. 2005 meeting. Note that there are existing data management structures (e.g., within US NSF and European collaborative projects) that will be integrated with IPICS data management.
3.7 Data Policy Agreement
Will this activity sign up to the IPY draft Data Policy (see website)
Yes
3.8 How will the activity contribute to developing the next generation
of polar scientists, logisticians, etc.?
IPICS provides a long-term plan for ice coring science that should provide the field with continuity and a stable future, which will be attractive to graduate students and junior scientists and engineers embarking on careers in this area. International cooperation is particularly relevant here, as the IPICS structure should make it possible for scientists and engineers to move between projects spearheaded by different national operators or consortia of national operators.
3.9 How will this activity address education, outreach and communication
issues outlined in the Framework document?
Ice coring is a very publicly visible scientific activity. The preservation of ancient snowfall, air, and biological material is captivating and easily understandable. IPICS includes a number of talented individual public communicators (including the authors of several popular books about polar science), as well as several groups with established records of outreach to K-12 education, museums, and other venues. IPICS is planning outreach in a number of ways:
1) The IPICS steering committee will coordinate outreach. Developing a formal outreach plan will be an agenda item at the Oct. 2005 IPICS meeting.
2) Individual projects will develop outreach with organizations that specialize in these efforts. For example, the WAIS Divide project is proposing collaboration with scientists leading undergraduate students in glaciology field research, museums developing permanent and travelling exhibits, and university education faculty developing curricula for K-12 schools.
3) Print, television and other media will visit IPICS field and laboratory sites.
4) Individual investigators will conduct local outreach.
5) IPICS projects will recruit graduate students, postdocs, and junior researchers.
3.10 What are the proposed sources of funding for this activity?
As with previous ice core drillings, funds will be obtained for each sub-component from national operators, as well as from international funding sources such as the EU. Coordination of funding and project logistics between nations will be required. Support for some elements of IPICS is already in place (for example, WAIS Divide drilling, Talus Dome drilling).
3.11 Additional Comments
The project components were agreed on as a consensus plan at the IPICS meeting in April 2004. The U.S. Ice Core Working Group has also endorsed the IPICS plan. The PAGES International Project Office has expressed enthusiasm for the proposed efforts and welcomes opportunities to facilitate international links to IPICS activities. IPICS is pursuing links with SCAR. The second IPICS meeting takes place in October in Brussels, where individual project plans, and overall coordination, will be discussed further.
4.1 Contact Details
Lead Contact
Dr Edward Brook
Oregon State University
104 Wilkinson Hall, OSU, Corvallis, OR
97331
USA
Tel:
541 737-8197
Mobile:
N/A
Fax:
541 737-1200
Email:
brooke@geo.oregonstate.edu
Second Contact
Dr Eric Wolff
British Antarctic Survey
High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge
CB3 0ET
UK
Tel:
44 (0)1223 221 491
Mobile:
N/A
Fax:
44 (0)1223221279
Email:
ewwo@bas.ac.uk
4.2 Other significant consortium members and their affiliation
| Name | Organisation | Country |
|---|---|---|
| Dominique Raynaud | LGGE, Grenoble | France |
| Dorthe Dahl-Jensen | Niels Bohr Institute, Dept. of Geophysics | Denmark |
| Heinz Miller | Alfred Wegener Institute | Germany |
| Hideki Motoyama | National Institute of Polar Research | Japan |
| Kendrick Taylor | Desert Research Institute | USA |
| Massimo Frezzotti | ENEA CLIM-OSS | Italy |
| Thomas Stocker | Climate and Environmental Physics, Univ. Berne | Switzerland |
| Vin Morgan | Antarctic CRC and Australian Antarctic Division | Australia |
| Yoshiyuki Fujii | National Institute of Polar Research | Japan |