|
![]() |
IPY 2007-2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated
on
05/01/2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Full Proposals for IPY 2007-2008 Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Locations | Coordindates |
|---|---|
| Dome A, Antarctica | 81S, 77E, 4100m |
| Dome C, Antarctica | 75S, 123E, 3200m |
| Summit, Greenland | 73N, 38W, 3200m |
| Northern Ellesmere Island, North West Territories, Canada | 82N, 80W, 2500m |
2.4 Define the approximate timeframe(s) for proposed field activities?
| Arctic Fieldwork time frame(s) | Antarctic Fieldwork time frame(s) |
|---|---|
| 06/07 – 09/08 | 11/07 – 02/09 |
2.5 What major logistic support/facilities will be required for
this project?
Fixed wing transport aircraft
Inland traverse support
Existing stations (Dome C, Summit)
New field station (Dome A, Ellesmere Island)
Automated observatories (AASTINOs, multi-instrumented platforms)
Further details – AASTINOs need to be transported to the four sites. This can be done using either LC-130 (ski-equipped) aircraft, or overland traverses on a separate trailer. These would take the laboratories to their sites, together with the fuel and the bulk of the experiments. They weigh about 4 tonnes each. Personnel would need to be taken to the sites by fixed wing aircraft. 4-6 people, working from 2-4 weeks at each site, are required. Traverses may readily be shared with other projects simply by adding a trailer containing the AASTINO. The project also needs logistic support to bring the pathfinder experiments to their sites, in particular that associated with the cosmic microwave background experiments at Dome C.
2.6 How will the required logistics be supplied? Have operators been approached?
| Source of logistic support | Likely potential sources | Support agreed |
|---|---|---|
| Consortium of national polar operators |
Y | |
| Own national polar operator | ||
| Another national polar operator | ||
| National agency | ||
| Military support | Y | |
| Commercial operator | Y | |
| Own support | ||
| Other |
2.7 If working in the Arctic regions, has there been contact with local indigenous groups or relevant authorities regarding access?
3.1 Origin of the activity
This is a new activity developed for the IPY period
If part of an existing programme please name the programme – The project builds upon previous site testing activities at South Pole and Dome C, but is a new activity. For some of the pathfinder science programs the IPY represents a pulse of activity that will continue afterwards.
3.2 How will the activity be organised and managed? Describe
the proposed management structure and means for coordinating across the
cluster
The project will be organised as a collaboration between scientists of the participating countries. The lead organisation will be the University of New South Wales (UNSW) in Australia, who designed and operate the AASTINO. A management board will consist of representatives from the collaborating countries. Each investigation within the project will have its own PI, the person responsible for a particular instrument or instrument suite. A science team will be appointed by the management board to recommend the final experiment suite. A website will be used to provide project information for all members, and most communication will be conducted through email. When necessary, conference calls will be organised when more immediate decisions are required. Dialogue will also be maintained with other groups involved in any shared traverses and flights to ensure that the scientific requirements of all projects can be met.
The individual experiments are to be funded through applications to national and EC funding agencies. These include both science and polar funding bodies in the relevant countries. Proposals are already under consideration by Australia (AASTINO for Dome A), Denmark (AASTINO for Summit), the USA (HEAT experiment for Dome A) and Canada (AASTINO for Ellesmere Island). Some aspects are already funded, for instance the CLOVER microwave background experiment for Dome C by the UK and the ARENA network by the EC. Proposals range from feasibility studies to the full design phase across the project.
Support is needed from national polar operators to provide logistics, in particular the access to Summit, Dome C and Dome A for equipment and personnel. This is best handled as a combination of overland traverse and air transportation.
A critical design review of the project will be held during the AAA/PASTA workshop at the next SCAR meeting, in Hobart in 2006.
3.3 Will the activity leave a legacy of infrastructure and if
so in what form?
The AASTINO will provide a laboratory that can be used to support future scientific experiments after the IPY has finished. Yearly maintenance (conducted via air support), including replenishment of fuel and replacement of instrumentation, would allow for a variety of future scientific uses. The CLOVER telescope mount and support facilities will also remain at Dome C after completion (around 2010) and then be available for use by other projects.
3.4 Will the activity involve nations other than traditional
polar nations? How will this be addressed?
The two experiments to be conducted from Summit involve scientists from Austria and Spain (earthshine) and Poland (site quantification).
3.5 Will this activity be linked with other IPY core activities?
If yes please specify
This project has direct synergies with any IPY activity that requires traverse capability to Domes A or C, along the ridge of the Antarctic plateau. It would also be possible to deploy an AASTINO to other high point along the plateau ridge (e.g. Domes B and F, Vostok) if a traverse went to those locations.
3.6 How will the activity manage its data? Is there a viable
plan and which data management organisations/structures will be involved?
Data will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals, as has been the practice over the entire astronomical site testing program. The data itself will be made publicly available through the Antarctic Data Centre system, again as has been standard practice, with appropriate metadata records to allow easy access to electronic queries. Its format will be complaint with the Virtual Observatory (a world-wide collaborative data management effort by the astronomical community). Web sites of the partners will also provide direct access to the available material. The various site data obtained from the participants in this project will also be used to refine design requirements and for optimisation of instrument parameters.
3.7 Data Policy Agreement
Will this activity sign up to the IPY draft Data Policy (see website)
Yes
3.8 How will the activity contribute to developing the next generation
of polar scientists, logisticians, etc.?
The polar regions provide the finest locations on the planet for the conduct of frontline astronomical observations, able to facilitate experiments that peer back in time to over 13 billion years ago, to the beginning of the universe. Such a grand vision will provide inspiration for the next generation of scientists. All those involved in polar exploration will know they are contributing to humanities quest to explore the universe, and to understand where we came from.
3.9 How will this activity address education, outreach and communication
issues outlined in the Framework document?
A successful, and long-established outreach program has been conducted during the past decade of astronomical site testing activity in Antarctica. This centres on the daily Antarctic diaries published electronically by the participating scientists, the web cameras at South Pole and Dome C, and an ongoing program of public talks and magazine articles (see, for instance, www.phys.unsw.edu.au/jacara). We aim to continue this program, in particular making use of satellite communications to bring the immediacy of the project to the target audiences, such as the participation in live exchanges with the scientists working in the field. We will also appoint an “ambassador to Greenland” whose task will be to involve local schools in the use of data gathered at Summit in the classroom.
This project will directly contribute to several educational goals for it will allow participation by graduate and higher-year undergraduate students at universities, as taking part in it will contribute to the research projects they need to conduct for their degrees.
3.10 What are the proposed sources of funding for this activity?
Logistical support from National Program Operators is required to bring the experiments and personnel to the four sites (Ellesmere Island, Summit, Dome A, Dome C). Funding for the experiments will be sought by investigators from individual countries. Current support includes:
• Dome C CLOVER CMBR experiment fully funded (UK PPARC, £5m, PI Piccirillo). The related BRAIN instrument has applied for Italian funding (PI Masi). A pathfinder experiment has been funded for £200K by France, Italy and the UK.
• Dome C measurement of ground layer turbulence (US NSF, US$114K, PI Travouillon).
• Dome C ARENA Network from European Union (€1.5m, PI Epchtein).
• Design studies for Antarctic interferometer from Belgium (€35K, PI Surdej).
The following grant applications are also awaiting funding decisions:
• Summit AASTINO and experiment suite (Denmark, €500K, PI Rasmussen).
• Dome A HEAT (High Elevation Antarctic Telescope) (US NSF, US$5m, PI Walker).
• Dome A AASTINO to house HEAT (Australia ARC, A$300K, PI Walsh).
• Dome C feasibility study for sub-mm telescope (Italian PNRA, PI Olmi).
• Marsden Fund, feasibility study for detecting planets by microlensing (NZ, PI Bond).
• Ellesmere Island site, to Canadian NSERC (science) and PCSP (logistics) (PI Carlberg).
3.11 Additional Comments
2.7If working in the Arctic regions, has there been contact with local indigenous groups or relevant authorities regarding access? - Yes for Summit Station.
Dome A is the last frontier in Antarctica to be explored, the most remote and extreme environment on the Earth’s surface. At the start of the third millennium, human ingenuity has driven the development of technology to the level where it can now support scientific endeavours at this last outpost on the Earth. Furthermore, it is expected that Dome A will provide the foremost location on our planet for the exploration of the cosmos, including the search for earth-like planets in the Galaxy. It is fitting and beautiful that Antarctica, the last place on our own Earth to be fully explored, may turn out to be the best place from which to discover new earths.
4.1 Contact Details
Lead Contact
Associate Professor Michael Burton
University of New South Wales
School of Physics
UNSW
Sydney
NSW
2052
Australia
Tel:
+61-2-9385-5618
Mobile:
+61-412-673-269
Fax:
+61-2-9385-6060
Email:
m.burton@unsw.edu.au
Second Contact
Dr Lucio Piccirillo
University of Cardiff
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of Cardiff
5 The Parade
Cardiff
CF24 3YB
UK
Tel:
+44-29-2087-5031
Mobile:
+44-(0)-7715-489139
Fax:
+44-29-2087-4056
Email:
Lucio.piccirillo@astro.cf.ac.uk
4.2 Other significant consortium members and their affiliation
| Name | Organisation | Country |
|---|---|---|
| Maurizio Candidi | Instituto Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario | Italy |
| Eric Fossat | Laboratoire d’Astrophysique Universitaire de Nice | France |
| Chris Walker | University of Arizona | USA |
| Tony Travouillon | Caltech | USA |
| Mark McCaughrean | University of Exeter | UK |
| Ian Bond | Massey University | New Zealand |
| Cui Xiangqun | Nanjing Institute of Astronomical Optics and Technology | China |
| Yongheng Zhao | National Astronomical Observatories | China |
| Shoji Torii | Kanagawa University | Japan |
| John Storey | University of New South Wales | Australia |
| Michael Ashley | University of New South Wales | Australia |
| Jon Lawrence | University of New South Wales | Australia |
| Wilfred Walsh | University of New South Wales | Australia |
| Li Yuansheng | Polar Research Institute of China | China |
| Yongqiang Yao | Beijing Astronomical Observatory | China |
| Nicolas Epchtein | Universite de Nice | France |
| Jean Surdej | Universite de Liege | Belgium |
| Peter Thejll | Danish Meteorological Institute | Denmark |
| Michael Andersen | Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam | Germany |
| Luca Olmi | Arcetri Observatory | Italy |
| Giorgio Sironi | Universita di Milano Bicocca | Italy |
| Paolo Saraceno | IFSI-INAF | Italy |
| Giuseppe Pelosi | Universita di Firenze | Italy |
| Ray Carlberg | University of Toronto | Canada |
| Silvia Masi | University of Roma La Sapienza | Italy |
| Massimo Gervasi | Milano Biocca University | Italy |
| Yannik Giraud-Heroud | APC Paris University | France |
| Paolo de Bernardis | University of Roma La Sapienza | Italy |
| Jim Bartlett | APC Paris University | France |
| Ana Ulla | Universidade de Vigo | Spain |
| Arnold Hanslmeir | University of Graz | Austria |
| Per Kjaegaard Rasmussen | University of Copenhagen | Denmark |
| Helge Sorensen | Danish Meteorological Institute | Denmark |
| Klaus Strassmeier | Astrophysikalisches Institut Potsdam | Germany |
| Lech Mankiewicz | Polish Academy of Sciences | Poland |
| Grzegorz Wrochna | Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies | Poland |
| Giampaolo Vettolani | INAF | Italy |