|
![]() |
IPY 2007-2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated
on
05/01/2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Full Proposals for IPY 2007-2008 Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Locations | Coordindates |
|---|---|
| Summit, Greenland | |
| South Pole, Antarctica | |
| Dronning Maud Land, Antarctica | |
| Concordia Station, Antarctica | |
| Swedish Icebreaker | 90 to 85 N |
| Other stations and remote sensors |
2.4 Define the approximate timeframe(s) for proposed field activities?
| Arctic Fieldwork time frame(s) | Antarctic Fieldwork time frame(s) |
|---|---|
| 04/07-08/08 | 10/07-02/09 |
2.5 What major logistic support/facilities will be required for
this project?
Existing field stations
Icebreaker
Further details – Existing stations: Summit, South Pole, Concordia, Halley, others.Icebreaker: Swedish Icebreaker
2.6 How will the required logistics be supplied? Have operators been approached?
| Source of logistic support | Likely potential sources | Support agreed |
|---|---|---|
| Consortium of national polar operators |
Y | Y |
| Own national polar operator | Y | Y |
| Another national polar operator | ||
| National agency | Y | |
| Military support | ||
| Commercial operator | ||
| Own support | ||
| Other |
2.7 If working in the Arctic regions, has there been contact with local indigenous groups or relevant authorities regarding access?
3.1 Origin of the activity
This is a pulse of activity during 2007-2009 within an existing programme
If part of an existing programme please name the programme – AICI (IGAC)
3.2 How will the activity be organised and managed? Describe
the proposed management structure and means for coordinating across the
cluster
AICI-IPY will be managed and coordinated by the AICI SSC, which exists, has been approved by IGAC, and which has support from the IGAC offices. We expect to add members from component sub-projects including ASCOS and the ANTCI activities. The AICI SSC will delegate responsibility for individual components such as OASIS and Summit activities to the executive groups already existing or planned for those components. The AICI SC will form a small task group to promote and coordinate the ozone network.
AICI-IPY forms part of the sub-cluster 4.1 on Clouds, aerosol and chemical composition. It has been agreed that within this sub-cluster there will be meetings of the activity leads in order to foster collaboration between the different activities. It is also proposed to have joint workshops and after the main field phase joint publication in journal special sections involving several activities. The sub-cluster led by the OASIS project (344) will also form part of this grouping as their activities are closely linked to our cluster activities and in particular POLARCAT and AICI.
3.3 Will the activity leave a legacy of infrastructure and if
so in what form?
The legacy will mainly be in the form of increased understanding of the scale of different processes in the polar atmosphere. However, it is expected that it will lead to the initiation of atmospheric chemistry studies at some stations that until now have not included this activity, and to a capacity for routine autonomous measurements of some chemical components.
3.4 Will the activity involve nations other than traditional
polar nations? How will this be addressed?
All nations that have a presence in either the Arctic or Antarctic could contribute: the ozone spatial network particularly has a low entry price level, and any nation could deploy a single sensor.
3.5 Will this activity be linked with other IPY core activities?
If yes please specify
Yes. AICI organised a coordination meeting at the EGU conference in Vienna (April 2005), which involved the leads of several of the Clouds, aerosol and chemical composition cluster. At a planning meeting hosted by POLARCAT (244) in May 2005, the leads of AICI (213), OASIS (344), and ATMOPOL (89) were present. E-mail contacts were also made with ORACLE-03 (542), POLAR AOD (299) and SYNSCOPE (268). Close scientific cooperation was agreed including joint activities such as workshops and the publication of a small series of review papers in 2006 summarising the state of knowledge prior to IPY.
3.6 How will the activity manage its data? Is there a viable
plan and which data management organisations/structures will be involved?
Most data will be submitted to national and international data centres. AICI plans to use its emerging web site as a central metadata point for all AICI datasets, linking to the individual data. We will also discuss with other partners in the clouds, aerosol and chemical composition cluster whether to aim for a common format and repository.
3.7 Data Policy Agreement
Will this activity sign up to the IPY draft Data Policy (see website)
Yes
3.8 How will the activity contribute to developing the next generation
of polar scientists, logisticians, etc.?
AICI will provide a fascinating research challenge to young scientists, that should enthuse them about the importance of the polar regions within atmospheric chemistry.
3.9 How will this activity address education, outreach and communication
issues outlined in the Framework document?
Scientists involved in existing related activities such as Summit, ANTCI (South Pole) and Alert2000 have a strong record of outreach activities including educational web sites, web chat Q and A sessions with schools, and teachers joining field parties. We anticipate making a strong plan to continue such activities.
The AICI chair (Wolff) is on the scientific committee of the European Research Course on Atmospheres, and he will work with ERCA leaders to ensure an increased visibility of polar atmospheres as a result of IPY. We have also contacted the lead of AITI and GELATI (260, 267) teaching initiatives, offering that the cluster can provide atmospheric chemistry content to these initiatives.
3.10 What are the proposed sources of funding for this activity?
Parts of the project already have funding in place from national plans, while some parts (such as ozone sensor deployments) will mainly be subsumed in existing logistic activities. For plateau studies, ASCOS and related OASIS and ITCT activities, individual national funds will be sought based on international science plans.
3.11 Additional Comments
AICI seeks to be a umbrella over specific tasks, with the management of each task firmly at the task level, and AICI providing only the added-value glue of motivation, context, coordination and integrating activities.
4.1 Contact Details
Lead Contact
Dr Eric Wolff
British Antarctic Survey
High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge
CB3 0ET
UK
Tel:
+44 1223 221491
Mobile:
N/A
Fax:
+44 1223 221279
Email:
ewwo@bas.ac.uk
Second Contact
Prof Paul Shepson
Purdue University
Departments of Chemistry, and Earth and Atmospheric Sciences
560 Oval Drive
West Lafayette
IN 47907-2
USA
Tel:
+1 765 494 7441
Mobile:
N/A
Fax:
+1 765 496 2874
Email:
pshepson@purdue.edu
4.2 Other significant consortium members and their affiliation
| Name | Organisation | Country |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Tjernström | Dept of Meteorology, Stockholm University | Sweden |
| Caroline Leck | Dept of Meteorology, Stockholm University | Sweden |
| Jack Dibb | University of New Hampshire | USA |
| Stephen Wood | NIWA | New Zealand |
| Kathy Law | Service d’Aeronomie/IPSL | France |
| Jack McConnell | York University, Toronto | Canada |
| Greg Huey | Georgia Tech | USA |
| Andreas Stohl | NILU | Norway |
| Rolf Weller | AWI | Germany |
| Anna Jones | BAS | UK |
| Petr Klan | Masaryk University, Brno | Czech Republic |
| Karin Kreher | NIWA | New Zealand |
| Katja Riedel | NIWA | New Zealand |