|
![]() |
IPY 2007-2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated
on
05/01/2009
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Full Proposals for IPY 2007-2008 Activities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Locations | Coordindates |
|---|---|
| Aircraft, based in e.g. Longyearbyen (Svalbard), Thule (Greenland), Kiruna (Sweden), transects between Tomsk and Yakutsk (Russia) | |
| Ny Ålesund, Kinnvika, Hornsund, Longyearbyen, Barentsburg, Zeppelin mountain (Svalbard) | |
| Summit, Kangerlussuaq, Cape Farewell (Greenland) | |
| Andoya, Bjornoya, Jan Mayen, Hopen, Tromso (Norway) | |
| Abisko (Sweden), Värriö, Pallas GAW, Kaamanen, Rovaniemi (Finland) | |
| Barrow, Alaska (USA); various ships | |
| Kuujjuarapik, Quebec; Ellesmere Is., Alert (Canada) | |
| Kola Peninsula, Kotelny Island, Tiksi, Wrangel Is., Lena River (Russia) |
2.4 Define the approximate timeframe(s) for proposed field activities?
| Arctic Fieldwork time frame(s) | Antarctic Fieldwork time frame(s) |
|---|---|
| 04/07- 04/07 | |
| 11/07- 04/08 | |
| 05/08 - 08/08 |
2.5 What major logistic support/facilities will be required for
this project?
Fixed wing geophysical aircraft
Observatories
Existing field stations
Multi-instrumented platforms
Icebreaker
Further details – airport requirements are suitable runway, de-icing facilities, hangars for one or more aircraft, contacts with air traffic control/customs, facilities for chemical preparation, fast internet connections for flight planning/coordination. Surface sites require logistical support for materials, shipping equipment/samples etc.
2.6 How will the required logistics be supplied? Have operators been approached?
| Source of logistic support | Likely potential sources | Support agreed |
|---|---|---|
| Consortium of national polar operators |
||
| Own national polar operator | Y | Y |
| Another national polar operator | ||
| National agency | Y | |
| Military support | ||
| Commercial operator | Y | |
| Own support | ||
| Other | Y |
2.7 If working in the Arctic regions, has there been contact with local indigenous groups or relevant authorities regarding access?
3.1 Origin of the activity
This is a new activity developed for the IPY period
3.2 How will the activity be organised and managed? Describe
the proposed management structure and means for coordinating across the
cluster
The POLARCAT White Paper (http://zardoz.nilu.no/~andreas/POLARCAT/) describes in detail how POLARCAT will be managed and how it is linked to other IPY activities. POLARCAT forms part of the sub-cluster 4.1 on Clouds, aerosol and chemical composition. It has been agreed that within this sub-cluster there will be meetings of the activity leads in order to foster collaboration between the different activities. It is also proposed to have joint workshops and after the main field phase joint publication in journal special sections involving several activities. The sub-cluster led by the OASIS project (344) will also form part of this grouping as their activities are closely linked to our cluster activities and in particular POLARCAT and AICI. There are also links with EoI 158 on hydrological impacts of aerosol.Within this overarching IPY umbrella, POLARCAT has defined its own management structure. A Steering Group has been formed led by the activity lead (chair) and co-chair. It is made up of representatives from the original ITCT-Arctic proposal and other EoIs joining this activity within POLARCAT (e.g. POLAP, STEP, HgCanEurasia). The Steering Group will report directly to the Steering Committees of IGAC, where POLARCAT has been endorsed as a new task, and SPARC which is in the process of endorsing this activity. This will ensure that the project is overseen by independent experts within an international framework. Note also that the POLARCAT SG includes current members of the IGAC SC (Law, Parrish) who are also IGAC representatives on the SPARC SC. POLARCAT has also defined several Working Groups on data management, aircraft/satellite data, surface sites, campaign planning, analysis and modelling. A further activity on education and outreach will be developed in coordination with, for example, the EU ACCENT network. The WGs will be coordinated by task teams (SG members) responsible for coordinating activities within and between WGs. An implementation plan will be written in early 2006 detailing the specific field activities that will take place as part of POLARCAT and links with other sub-cluster 4.1 and related (e.g. OASIS) activities. SG meetings and meetings/discussions with other sub-cluster leads will facilitate this process. Meetings will be held in 2005/6 to plan and coordinate the field intensives.
3.3 Will the activity leave a legacy of infrastructure and if
so in what form?
POLARCAT will leave a legacy in terms of a very comprehensive dataset on atmospheric composition in the troposphere and lower stratosphere that will be used to characterise aerosol, oxidant and pollutant loadings in the Arctic and their impact on climate. Several surface sites are new (e.g. Cape Farewell, Greenland) and it is planned to continue their operation after IPY. Development and installation of new instrumentation (e.g. mercury sensors) at surface sites and on aircraft are also planned and will be available for future missions after IPY.
3.4 Will the activity involve nations other than traditional
polar nations? How will this be addressed?
This activity will involve scientists from more than a dozen nations, many of which are not considered as traditional polar nations (e.g. Columbia, China, Switzerland). It will also arrange workshops and conferences, which will inform the global scientific community on new findings.
3.5 Will this activity be linked with other IPY core activities?
If yes please specify
Yes. At a planning meeting in May 2005, the leads of OASIS (344), AICI (213), and ATMOPOL (89) were present. E-mail contacts were also made with PO3L (542), POLAR AOD (299) and there was a coordination meeting at the EGU conference in Vienna (April 2005). Close scientific cooperation was agreed including joint activities such as workshops and the publication of a small series of review papers in 2006 summarising the state of knowledge prior to IPY.
3.6 How will the activity manage its data? Is there a viable
plan and which data management organisations/structures will be involved?
There will be a POLARCAT Working Group specifically tasked with data management. A data management plan and a protocol for data quality control and quality assurance will be developed It is most probable that the data will be held at different data centres (i.e. NILU, NASA, BADC, DLR, NOAA, NDSC, GAW) with links via the POLARCAT website. Sub-projects which have their own websites (e.g. POLAP, TOPAS) would also link to the POLARCAT website. Meta data links will also be made to other core IPY activities.In the particular case of the field campaigns, data will be submitted to the distributed data centres in a common format which has already been used in previous multi-aircraft campaigns (e.g. ICARTT in 2004). It is envisaged that surface site data would also be made available in common formats where possible. Quick look data from sites/aircraft/satellites taking part in field intensives will be available to colleagues in near-real time for flight planning with raw data available within a few weeks after the campaign. Final data will be available after a short time (about 6-9 months) after the campaigns. After a defined period (about 18 months) the data will be made public. For POLARCAT, merged files of final data from the different measurement platforms will be produced. These plans will be discussed and developed at the next POLARCAT planning meeting.
3.7 Data Policy Agreement
Will this activity sign up to the IPY draft Data Policy (see website)
Yes
3.8 How will the activity contribute to developing the next generation
of polar scientists, logisticians, etc.?
POLARCAT will provide PhD positions to train young researchers. Some of the participants will also offer courses for students at their universities. Outreach activities will also offer material for school teachers in order to attract young people into polar and atmospheric research. Courses will also be held at field stations (e.g. in STEP: Nordic graduate school CBACCI - Biosphere-Carbon-Aerosol-Cloud-Climate Interactions).
3.9 How will this activity address education, outreach and communication
issues outlined in the Framework document?
Participants have a good record in communicating results to the public (e.g. NASA, DLR) and making new results quickly available to the media. The project will make use of facilities being developed related to e-learning, particularly for undergraduates, in the framework of the EU ACCENT network. Outreach activities targeted towards school children will include “Teacher at Sea” (which already in the past has taken teachers onto the research vessel R.H. Brown during research cruises) or “Teachers and researchers exploring and collaborating” (TREC). A POLARCAT web site will be created that will serve the communication among researchers, the communication between researchers and journalists, and will also communicate information on the program to the public. Press conferences will be held during the field campaigns. Communication of polar atmospheric research to other atmospheric researchers will be carried out via reviewed publications, established newsletters (e.g., IGAC and SPARC) and presentations at international conferences.
3.10 What are the proposed sources of funding for this activity?
The field campaign in April 2007 is already funded together with some surface/satellite activities (e.g. Finnish Acad. Sciences, CARBO-Ocean, Polish Nat. Comm., Canadian Space Agency, BMBF). For the major part, funding is being sought from national agencies (e.g. NASA, NOAA, NSF, NERC, CNRS, Norges forskningsråd, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, SNF, Spanish Program for Polar Research, State Committee for Scientific Research of Poland, INTAS, IPEV, etc.). Agencies and participating institutions will also bring in their own funds (AWI, DLR, CNES, NASA, NOAA). It is also planned to submit a proposal to EU FP VII under the Global Change priority.
3.11 Additional Comments
4.1 Contact Details
Lead Contact
Dr Andreas Stohl
Norsk institutt for luftforskning
Instituttveien 18, P.O. Box 100, Kjeller
2027
Norway
Tel:
+47 6389 8035
Mobile:
N/A
Fax:
+47 6389 8050
Email:
ast@nilu.no
Second Contact
Dr Kathy Law
CNRS Service Aéronomie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie
Tour 45-46, 3eme étage, Boite 102,4 Place Jussieu, Paris Cedex 05
75252
France
Tel:
-44278389
Mobile:
N/A
Fax:
-44273744
Email:
kathy.law@aero.jussieu.fr
4.2 Other significant consortium members and their affiliation
| Name | Organisation | Country |
|---|---|---|
| Michel Carleer | U. Libre de Bruxelles | Belgium |
| Pierre Coheur | U. Libre de Bruxelles | Belgium |
| Jim Whiteway | York University | Canada |
| Laurier Poissant | Environment Canada | Canada |
| Brian Stocks | Canadian Forest Service | Canada |
| Peter Bernath | University of Waterloo | Canada |
| Jan Bottenheim | Environment Canada | Canada |
| Xinbin Feng | State Key Lab. Env. Geochem. | China |
| Bastidas/Rodriguez | U. Cauca | Columbia |
| Urmas Hõrrak | U. Tarto | Estonia |
| Lauri Laakso/ Markku Kulmala | U. Helsinki | Finland |
| John Moore | U. Lapland | Finland |
| Jussi Paatero / Risto Hillamo | Finnish Met. Inst. | Finland |
| Jacques Pelon | Service d’Aéronomie, CNRS, Paris | France |
| Gerard Ancellet | Service d’Aéronomie, CNRS, Paris | France |
| Cathy Clerbaux | Service d’Aéronomie, CNRS, Paris | France |
| J.-P. Cammas/P. Nedelec | Laboratoire d’Aérologie, Toulouse | France |
| Philippe Ricaud | Laboratoire d’Aérologie, Toulouse | France |
| Philippe Ciais/ M. Ramonet | LSCE/CEA-CNRS, Paris | France |
| Marc Delmotte | LSCE/CEA-CNRS, Paris | France |
| Christophe Ferreira | LGGE/CNRS, Grenoble | France |
| Jean-Francois Gayet | LaMP, U. Blaise Pascale, Clermont Ferrand | France |
| Hans Schlager | DLR | Germany |
| Andreas Minikin | DLR | Germany |
| Heidi Huntrieser | DLR | Germany |
| Fred Stroh | FZK, Julich | Germany |
| John Burrows, A. Kokhanovsky | U. Bremen | Germany |
| Thomas Wagner/ Ulrich Platt | U. Heidelberg | Germany |
| Roland Neuber | Alfred Wegener Institute, Potsdam | Germany |
| Andreas Herber | Alfred Wegener Institute, Bremerhaven | Germany |
| Justus Notholt | U. Bremen | Germany |
| Joerg Trentmann | U. Mainz | Germany |
| Gunnar Luderer | MPIC, Mainz | Germany |
| Thomas von Clarmann | IMK-FZ, Karlsruhe | Germany |
| Hans Feichter, Stefan Kinne | MPI Meteorology, Hamburg | Germany |
| Ugo Cortesi | IFAC/CNR | Italy |
| Francesco Cairo | CNR | Italy |
| Leopoldo Steffanuti | CNR/EEIG | Italy |
| Hajime Akimoto | Frontiers Research | Japan |
| Oliver Wild | Frontiers Research | Japan |
| Øystein Hov | Meteorological Institute | Norway |
| Jon Egill Kristjansson | U. Oslo | Norway |
| Kjetil Torseth, Jozef Pacyna, Georg Hansen | NILU | Norway |
| Michael Gausa | Andoya Rocket Range | Norway |
| Jon Borre Oerbaek | Norsk Polarinstitutte, Tromso | Norway |
| Wieslawa Ewa Krawczyk | U. Silesia | Poland |
| Piotr Glowacki | Institute of Geophysics, PAS | Poland |
| Sandra Mogo | U. Beira Interior | Portugal |
| Boris Belan | Institute Atmospheric Optics, Tomsk | Russia |
| Nikolai Elansky | Institute Atmospheric Physics, Moscow | Russia |
| Sergey Pyramikov | AARIR, Saint Petersburg | Russia |
| Angel Frutos Baraja | U. Valladolid | Spain |
| Per Holmlund | Stockhom Univ. | Sweden |
| HC Hansson | U. Stockholm | Sweden |
| Jo Urban/ Donal Murtagh | Chalmers U. | Sweden |
| Michael Tjernstrom/ C. Leck | U. Stockholm | Sweden |
| Almut Arneth | U. Lund | Sweden |
| Dietrich Feist | U. Bern | Switzerland |
| John Methven | U. Reading | UK |
| Mathew Evans | U. Leeds | UK |
| Hugh Coe/ Tom Choularton | U. Manchester | UK |
| Claire Reeves | U. East Anglia | UK |
| Paul Monks/ John Remedios | U. Leicester | UK |
| Alastair Lewis | U. York | UK |
| Rod Jones/ John Pyle | U. Cambridge | UK |
| Tim Heaton | British Geological Survey | UK |
| Andy Hodson | U. Sheffield | UK |
| Eric Wolff | British Antarctic Survey | UK |
| Brian Kerridge | Rutherford Appleton Laboratory | UK |
| Hanwant Singh | NASA Ames | USA |
| Hans-Jurg Jost | NASA | USA |
| David Parrish/Michael Trainer | NOAA | USA |
| Mike Fromm | Naval Research Lab | USA |
| Jack Dibb | U. New Hampshire | USA |
| Daniel Jacob | U. Harvard | USA |
| Paul Voss | U. Massachusetts | USA |
| Philip Russell | NASA | USA |
| John Burkhart | U. California, Merced | USA |
| Tim Bates / Patricia Quinn | NOAA | USA |
| Phil Rasch | NCAR | USA |
| Laura Pan | NCAR | USA |
| Steve Massie | NCAR | USA |
| AR Ravishankara | NOAA | USA |
| Richard Honrath | Michigan Technological University | USA |
| Mark Hermanson | U. Pennsylvania | USA |
| Charlie Zender/ Mark Flanner | U. California-Irvine | USA |
| Dong Wu | JPL/Caltech | USA |
| Owen Cooper | U. Colorado | USA |
| Matthew Lazzara | Antarctic Met. Research Centre, U. Wisconsin | USA |