|
![]() |
IPY 2007-2008 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Updated
on
05/01/2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Full Proposals for IPY 2007-2008 Activities
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Locations | Coordindates |
|---|---|
| Antarctic Peninsula | |
| Weddell Sea | |
| Haakon VII Sea | |
| Eastern Antarctic region | |
| Ross Sea | |
| Bellingshausen Sea | |
| Amundsen Sea |
2.4 Define the approximate timeframe(s) for proposed field activities?
| Arctic Fieldwork time frame(s) | Antarctic Fieldwork time frame(s) |
|---|---|
| 09/07 - 04/08 |
2.5 What major logistic support/facilities will be required for
this project?
Icebreaker
Ice strengthened research ship
Autonomous Underwater Vehicle
Submarines
Further details – CAML is happy to share logistics with other ocean-based projects – in particular, CASO (EoI 109), ANDEEP-SYSTCO (EoI 111), CCAMLR (EoI 148) and ICED (EoI 417).
2.6 How will the required logistics be supplied? Have operators been approached?
| Source of logistic support | Likely potential sources | Support agreed |
|---|---|---|
| Consortium of national polar operators |
Y | |
| Own national polar operator | Y | Y |
| Another national polar operator | Y | Y |
| National agency | Y | Y |
| Military support | ||
| Commercial operator | Y | |
| Own support | Y | Y |
| Other | Y | Y |
2.7 If working in the Arctic regions, has there been contact with local indigenous groups or relevant authorities regarding access?
3.1 Origin of the activity
This is a new activity developed for the IPY period
3.2 How will the activity be organised and managed? Describe
the proposed management structure and means for coordinating across the
cluster
The CAML is managed by a self-funded and self-organised Scientific Steering Committee (SSC), established by SCAR under the Evolution and Biodiversity in Antarctica (EBA) program. The Alfred P Sloan Foundation is contributing US$1.4 million to SCAR over 5 years for scientific coordination activities, including a full-time Project Coordinator. The Chief Scientist of Australian Antarctic program is the Project Administrator.
Since startup in early 2005, CAML has established a viable management plan and organisational structure, as a basis for strong scientific collaboration. Following a SSC planning meeting in Brussels in May 2005, five working groups have been established to plan detailed studies in CAML. Timelines have been agreed for commitments to the project and for logistic support. Calls for participation in CAML are being made during SCAR’s July 2005 Biology Symposium, at the Dynamic Planet conference in August 2005, and on the websites of SCAR and CAML. Calls will be made for scientists to participate in field studies and laboratory studies. Having corresponded and discussed issues with the proposers of all Marine Biodiversity EoIs, as shown on the IPY website, the CAML SSC is in active engagement across the cluster and intends to incorporate as many EoIs as it can.
The SSC will meet again in November 2005 to review progress in integration of all projects by the working groups. By this time it is hoped that the amount of ship time will be known, enabling the SSC to refine its scientific plans and objectives.
The CAML is providing funds to SCAR-MarBIN to enable it to become the Antarctic node of the Ocean Biodiversity information System (OBIS).
3.3 Will the activity leave a legacy of infrastructure and if
so in what form?
No, but CAML will leave some legacy sampling sites (identifiable by GPS) that can be re-sampled at intervals in the future in order to track changes in marine biodiversity. It will leave collections of marine specimens that will be used for biological research for many years to come. Although no direct legacy will be left by CAML, some of the data arising from the project will be made available through the SCAR-Marine Biodiversity Information Network (SCAR-MarBIN) portal, which will be designed to exceed the timeframe of IPY. In this respect, it will leave a legacy in the form of a valuable data recovery tool.
3.4 Will the activity involve nations other than traditional
polar nations? How will this be addressed?
The CAML is inclusive, already making links with researchers in Malaysia, Indonesia, Ukraine, India, China and Korea, as well as with traditional polar nations. In association with meetings such as the Census of Marine Life “All Programs” meeting in Frankfurt in November 2005, and Dynamic Planet in Cairns in August, productive international collaboration will be actively encouraged. Through the CAML SSC and website, many requests for involvement have been taken up by the CAML Administration.
3.5 Will this activity be linked with other IPY core activities?
If yes please specify
In line with its objectives and logistic requirements, the CAML will naturally link with other core IPY activities. Of course, this will include the other lead EoIs in the Marine Biodiversity cluster, namely ANDEEP-SYSTCO EoI 111 and SCAR-MarBIN EoI 817. For example, collaboration with physical oceanographers using the RV Polarstern is actively underway and has been endorsed through the German IPY Committee, particularly in connection with ANDEEP-SYSTCO EoI 111 and CCAMLR EoI 148, as well as core activities in other clusters (eg. CASO EoI 109). CAML has received endorsement through the Australian IPY Committee. The U.S. GEOTRACES EoI 271 provides a welcome link with chemical oceanographers, to coordinate the availability of nutrients with marine ecosystems. Further links with other IPY core activities will be forged through COMNAP, interactions with ship providers, and funding agencies. These links are supported by CAML but will also be driven in achieving cost-effective use of high capital sampling platforms.
3.6 How will the activity manage its data? Is there a viable
plan and which data management organisations/structures will be involved?
The CAML has a well-developed data management structure, with dedicated funding and staff already in place. SCAR has adopted the development of SCAR-MarBIN; a marine biodiversity information network, based in Brussels. The Belgian Government intends to commit two-person-years to the development of an interoperable network of Antarctic marine biodiversity databases. This will provide data to the Ocean Biodiversity Information System (OBIS), as required by the Census of Marine Life. The companion EoI 817 “SCAR-MarBIN: the information dimension of Antarctic marine Biodiversity” outlines the data management and informatics structures that will develop with CAML. The CAML is providing funds for SCAR-MarBIN to become the Antarctic node of OBIS.
3.7 Data Policy Agreement
Will this activity sign up to the IPY draft Data Policy (see website)
Yes
3.8 How will the activity contribute to developing the next generation
of polar scientists, logisticians, etc.?
The CAML ’s position at the forefront of new technologies for the study of biodiversity provides ideal opportunities to foster the new generation of polar scientists. A strong emphasis is placed on the participation of young scientists and students in the program; coordination funds are earmarked for this purpose. By establishing legacy sites and standard sampling protocols, CAML will provide a framework for the next generation of scientists to continue the Census work. A particular objective is the involvement of young scientists in the program.
3.9 How will this activity address education, outreach and communication
issues outlined in the Framework document?
In alliance with The Cousteau Society, an education and outreach program has been drafted for the CAML, under the direction of the SSC. As part of the program, the CAML website www.caml.aq was launched in June 2005. Brochures, posters and information presentations at five conferences in 2005 are underway. The use of underwater video and “crittercams” will provide a rich stream of pictorial material. A TV production company will be approached with a view to making a comprehensive before-during-and after documentary of CAML, following the success of this genre in other Census of Marine Life field projects.
3.10 What are the proposed sources of funding for this activity?
The CAML will be a very expensive project. Informally, we are aware of many nations that might offer ship time to the CAML. Work during 2005 with the Council of Managers of National Antarctic Programs (COMNAP) will identify the amount of ship time and the areas in which those ships will operate during the field-work phase of CAML. The major cost of CAML is ship time. Apart from the coordination/planning costs, which are being met by the Alfred P Sloan Foundation, the remaining costs will be for scientist support. A science plan for CAML, currently in draft form, will be completed by October 2005 and will be used by researchers as the basis of their applications to research funding bodies.
3.11 Additional Comments
We know more about the surface of the moon than we do about the surface of the Earth, because so much of our planet is covered by water. The CAML will focus attention of the public on the ice-bound oceans around Antarctica, to determine the present state of its biodiversity. This will be used to predict how the oceans might respond to future climate change. It will integrate knowledge across all regions, biomes, habitats and fields of study to strengthen our knowledge of ocean biodiversity and ecosystem dynamics. The coincidence of the IPY and the international Census of Marine Life makes CAML possible - a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to conduct a comprehensive study of the evolution and biology of this vast and fascinating region of the Earth.To assist the National Committees to locate their nation’s proposed activities, listed below are the EoIs for potential collaboration, that are being considered in development of the CAML science plan.
Marine Biodiversity Cluster EoIs:
1. Role of Antarctica and the Southern Ocean in Past, Present and Future Climate: A strategy for the International Polar Year 2007-2008 (CASO CClimate in Antarctica and the Southern Ocean)), EoI #109 led by Dr Steve Rintoul, Australia.
2. ANDEEP-SYSTCO (ANtarctic benthic DEEP-sea biodiversity: colonisation history and recent community patterns - SYSTem COupling) (ANDEEP-SYSTCO), EoI #111 led by Prof Angelika Brandt, Germany.
3. International CCAMLR 2008 synoptic survey of krill , pelagic fish and plankton biomass and biodiversity in the South Atlantic (Area 48) (CCAMLR - 2008 Survey), EoI #148 led by Dr Volker Siegel, Germany.
4. Cenozoic bryozoans in West Antarctica - taxonomy, biogeography and evolution (Cenozoic bryozoans), EoI #153 led by Dr Urszula Hara, Poland.
5. Internationally coordinated studies on Antarctic environmental status, biodiversity and ecosystems. (Environmental, Biological, and Ecological Studies in Antarctica (EBESA)), EoI #189 led by Prof Roberto Bargagli, Italy.
6. Seasonality of the Drake Passage pelagic ecosystem: Biodiversity, food webs, environmental change and human impact. Present and Past (DRAKE BIOSEAS), EoI #192 led by Dr Viviana Andrea Alder, Argentina.
7. Biological and functional diversity of microbial communities in ecologically distinct polar environments (Biological and functional diversity of microbial communities in ecologically distinct polar environments), EoI #205 led by Dr Irene Kit-Ping Tan, Malaysia.
8. Effects Of Isolation On The Genetic Biodiversity Of Shallow Coastal Benthic Communities In Antarctica (Effects Of Isolation On The Genetic Biodiversity Of Shallow Coastal Benthic Communities In Antarctica), EoI #219 led by Prof Zulfigar Yasin, Malaysia.
9. Antarctic Marine Mammal Ecology using Passive Acoustic Monitoring (Marine Mammal Passive Acoustic Monitoring (MMPAM)), EoI #236 led by Dr John Hildebrand, USA.
10. Winter algal communities: year-round phytoplankton studies at Palmer Station (Pal-Flow), EoI #330 Maria Vernet, USA.
11. Comparative Studies Of Gentoo Populations (GOSGEN), EoI #379 led by Dr Volodymyr Bezrukov, Ukraine.
12. SCAR-MarBIN: the information dimension of Antarctic Marine Biodiversity (SCAR-MarBIN), EoI #817 led by Dr Bruno Danis, Belgium.
13. Study of Antarctic Sea Ice Ecosystems (SASIE), EoI #818 led by Academician Igor Melnikov, Russia.
14. The coastal and shelf ecosystem of Maritime Antarctica (Admiralty Bay, King George Island) (CSEMA), EoI #863 led by Prof Rakusa-Suszczewski Stanislaw, Poland.
15. A study, using Autosub, of the influence of sea ice and sea-ice algae on the winter distribution and abundance of Antarctic krill off East Antarctica (Antarctic krill and sea ice), EoI #949 led by Dr Andrew Brierley, UK.
16. Polar Microbial Observatories in Antarctic and Sub-Antarctic coastal zones (POLMICROBS), EoI #953 led by Dr Jean-Francois Ghiglione, France
Other linked EoIs:
1. U.S. GEOTRACES: Biogeochemical cycles of trace elements in the SW Pacific Sector of the Southern Ocean (U.S. GEOTRACES in the Southern Ocean), EoI #271 led by Dr Robert Anderson, USA.
2. Integrated Analyses of Circumpolar Climate Interactions and Ecosystem Dynamics in the Southern Ocean -IPY (ICCED –IPY), EoI #417 led by Dr Eugene Murphy, UK.
3. CANADA #59: Canadian Census of Marine Life Arctic Ocean Biodiversity Program (Canadian Arctic Census of Marine Life), EoI #713 led by Mr Paul Snelgrove, Canada.
4.1 Contact Details
Lead Contact
Prof Michael Stoddart
Australian Antarctic Division
203 Channel Highway Kingston Tasmania
7050
Australia
Tel:
61 3 62323205
Mobile:
61 3 40984847
Fax:
61 3 62323585
Email:
michael.stoddart@aad.gov.au
Second Contact
Dr Victoria Wadley
Australian Antarctic Division
203 Channel Highway Kingston Tasmania
7005
Australia
Tel:
61 3 62323124
Mobile:
61 3 438 250902
Fax:
61 3 62323583
Email:
victoria.wadley@aad.gov.au
4.2 Other significant consortium members and their affiliation
| Name | Organisation | Country |
|---|---|---|
| Professor Angelika Brandt | University of Hamburg | Germany |
| Dr Claude De Broyer | Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences | Belgium |
| Professor Alison Murray | University of Nevada, Desert Research Inst | USA |
| Professor Paul Rodhouse | British Antarctic Survey | UK |
| Dr Diego Rodriguez | Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata | Argentina |
| Dr Lúcia de S Campos | Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro | Brazil |
| Dr Russell Hopcroft | University of Alaska Fairbanks | USA |
| Dr Julian Gutt | AWI Bremerhaven | Germany |
| Professor Antonio Solé Cava | Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro | Brazil |
| Dr Catherine Ozouf | CNRS | France |
| Professor Daniel Costa | University of California, Santa Cruz | USA |
| Dr Dean Peterson | Antarctica New Zealand, Christchurch | New Zealand |
| Dr Graham Hosie | Australian Antarctic Division | Australia |
| Professor Evgeny Pakhomov | University of British Columbia Vancouver | Canada |
| Dr Igor Smirnov | Zoological Insititute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St Petersburg | Russia |
| Dr Jesse Ausubel | Census of Marine Life | USA |
| Dr Jose Torres | University of South Florida | USA |
| Dr Krzyzstof Jazdzewski | University of Lodz | Poland |
| Dr Phil Trathan | British Antarctic Survey | UK |
| Dr Philip O'Brien | Geosciences Australia | Australia |
| Dr Philippe Koubbi | University Littoral | France |
| Dr Polly Penhale | National Science Foundation | USA |
| Dr Randall Davis | Texas A&M University | USA |
| Dr Stefano Schiaparelli | Università di Genova | Italy |
| Dr Tarik Chekchak | The Cousteau Society | France |
| Dr Jon Watkins | British Antarctic Survey | UK |
| Dr Bruno Danis | Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences | Belgium |
| Professor Zulfigar Yasin | Universiti Sains, Penang | Malaysia |
| Professor Riccardo Cattaneo Vietti | Universita degli studi di Genova | Italy |
| Daniel Rodary | France |